Why Susie Wiles Can’t Deny Spilling Trump Secrets
Vanity Fair’s Chris Whipple explains his Susie Wiles profile that is sending shockwaves through Trump’s White House.
Vanity Fair author Chris Whipple is defending his explosive profile of Susie Wiles amid the White House chief of staff’s attempt to discredit the piece—despite her prior enthusiasm.
Whipple told The Daily Beast Podcast that his story, which included revealing comments about Donald Trump and other administration figures like Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Vice President JD Vance, and Attorney General Pam Bondi, didn’t reflect “four-dimensional chess” on her part. Rather, the 11-interview session with Wiles, 68, over as many months was because she just “wanted to talk.”
“My instinct about this, having covered a few White Houses, is that with this White House and with Susie, it’s never four-dimensional chess, ever. I think Michael Wolff would agree with me, probably. It’s never even three-dimensional chess. It’s not even chess. It might be checkers,” Whipple told host Joanna Coles. “I just don’t think they’re that clever about it, or calculating.”

Wiles claimed the Vanity Fair article was a "hit piece," despite its author saying she was enthusiastic about the process.
X/SusieWiles
Whipple, whose works include a 2017 book about White House chiefs of staff and one about last year’s presidential election, said Wiles felt open to talking to him because of his reputation for being “even-handed, on both sides of the aisle.”
“When the subject of Vanity Fair came up, that this would become a piece for Vanity Fair, I can tell you she was all in,” Whipple emphasized. “She was enthusiastic about it, and here we are.”
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Wiles is now claiming that Whipple’s article was a hit piece with a lot of context missing. Whipple disagrees, likening Wiles’ complaint to a “non-denial denial.”

Whipple's piece about Wiles included 11 interviews in which she shared her apparently candid views on the president and those close to him.
Alex Wong/Getty Images
“It’s interesting that the White House has not disputed a single fact in the piece because we’re on absolutely solid ground,” he explained. “Everything in that piece—everything Susie said—was on the record and on tape, by the way. So look, I understand that, you know, they’ve made a statement. It speaks for itself. But the Vanity Fair piece is absolutely solid, and all of her comments were on the record."
Whipple, for instance, played the New York Times a tape of Wiles talking about Elon Musk “microdosing” after she denied doing so.
Wiles also revealed to the author that she unsuccessfully lobbied against Trump pardoning Jan. 6 rioters, instituting steep tariffs, and extending his “score settling” against perceived political enemies past 90 days. Additionally, Wiles said she opposed gutting the U.S. Agency for International Development, and she acknowledged that Trump’s claims that Bill Clinton visited Jeffrey Epstein’s island were “wrong.” Bondi, Wiles added, “whiffed” on her handling of the Epstein case.
After publication of the story, Trump told the New York Post that he stands by Wiles continuing as chief of staff. The president also supported her description of him as having an “alcoholic’s personality.”
“No, she meant that I’m — you see, I don’t drink alcohol. So everybody knows that — but I’ve often said that if I did, I’d have a very good chance of being an alcoholic. I have said that many times about myself, I do. It’s a very possessive personality,” Trump told the paper.
Trump also criticized the story and Whipple himself.

Wiles tried to deny some of her comments to Whipple, only for the author to share audio tape proving her wrong.
Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
“I didn’t read it, but I don’t read Vanity Fair — but she’s done a fantastic job,” he said of Wiles. “I think from what I hear, the facts were wrong, and it was a very misguided interviewer, purposely misguided.”
Whipple responded by welcoming any potential legal challenge that the litigious president—who just this week sued the BBC for $10 billion—may bring.
“I can’t read Donald Trump’s mind. I’m not going to try to psychoanalyze him. But you know, he doesn’t shrink from a good fight either,” Whipple said.
“I say bring it. Let’s have the fight, if he wants, over the facts here,” he continued. “The facts are incontestable and the interviews are what they are, and Susie said what she said.”
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Daily Beast.
New episodes of The Daily Beast Podcast are released every Tuesday, Thursday and Sunday. Follow our new feed on your favorite podcast platform at beast.pub/dailybeastpod and subscribe on YouTube to watch full episodes.
Unlock a year of full access to The Looker and The Daily Beast for $35.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Looker and The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Sign in
Login dialog




ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in or create an account
Login dialog
Loading comments…
ADVERTISEMENT