Tulsi Gabbard Cornered on Trump’s Shameless Stunt
The director of national intelligence sidestepped questions about the president’s controversial fundraising tactics.

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard has been confronted over a controversial fundraising email seeking money for Donald Trump by exploiting soldiers killed in the Iran war.
The president came under fire last week when one of his fundraising committees sent out a shameless email featuring an image of Trump attending a dignified transfer honoring six fallen soldiers. It promised access to the president’s “private national security briefings” in exchange for donations.
Kevin Lamarque/Kevin Lamarque/REUTERS
“I AM PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP. YOU’RE THE ONLY REASON WE SAVED AMERICA,” the fundraising document reads.
“NOW I AM ASKING YOU TO CONSIDER MAKING A SMALL SUSTAINING CONTRIBUTION, SO WE CAN COMPLETE THE MAGA AGENDA! CAN I COUNT ON YOUR SUPPORT?”
The email was sent by Never Surrender Inc, a political action committee (PAC) associated with Donald Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign.
Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard testifies before a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., March 18, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
Kevin Lamarque/Reuters
But Gabbard, who oversees the nation’s intelligence agencies, found herself cornered over the document during a Senate committee hearing on Wednesday.
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
“The American people need to know that the president of the United States is fundraising for his political campaign and his PAC using images of American service members killed in action,” said Georgia Democrat Jon Ossoff.
The email then urges Trump fans to “claim your spot” in what it describes as an exclusive group that receives updates on national security threats.
U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff (D-GA) holds a printout of a fundraising email from President Donald Trump's political action committee, which uses an image from a dignified transfer honoring six fallen U.S. soldiers and promises access to the president’s "private national security briefings", during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., March 18, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
Kevin Lamarque/REUTERS
People who donate would, in turn, receive “the straight truth on border invasions, foreign adversaries, deep state sabotage, and every danger the fake news hides.”
Asked by Arizona Senator and military veteran Mark Kelly whether people who give money to Trump should have access to such briefings, Gabbard replied: “I’m not familiar with that document.”
“It was made public six days ago,” Kelly said. “We’ll get you a copy.”
CIA Director John Ratcliffe also attended the hearing and faced the same question.
“I don’t know what the document is, but regardless of what it says, it didn’t happen,” Ratcliffe said, suggesting Trump supporters donated money to the committee and got nothing in return.
“Well, what’s new?” Kelly replied.
CIA Director John Ratcliffe testifies before a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., March 18, 2026. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
Kevin Lamarque/REUTERS
This was not the first time that Trump’s questionable fundraising has come under scrutiny.
In the weeks after the January 6 attack in 2021, his campaign and affiliated groups sent a barrage of emails urging supporters to “defend election integrity,” raising tens of millions of dollars.
However, congressional investigators later found that much of that money flowed into a leadership PAC—Save America PAC—rather than being used for legal challenges as donors were led to believe.
Trump also faced backlash for his “election defense fund,” which, according to the House January 6 Committee, did not formally exist.
Fundraising emails repeatedly invoked the fund as a vehicle to contest the 2020 results, but investigators said the structure described to donors was, at best, misleading.
The committee also concluded that the tactic was part of a broader strategy to capitalize on false claims of widespread voter fraud.

Trump was under fire over the weekend for wearing a hat available to purchase on his website during the dignified transfer of six U.S. Army service members.
Anna Moneymaker/Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
However, using the image of fallen soldiers, and of Trump at their ceremony wearing his own merchandise baseball cap, was particularly contentious in the context of an unauthorized war, now into its third week.
Trump attended another dignified transfer on Wednesday, for another six U.S. troops who lost their lives in a plane crash over western Iraq last week.
However, the families involved requested no cameras at the event, minimizing the risk that their dead relatives would be used for fundraising or publicity stunts.
Unlock a year of full access to The Looker and The Daily Beast for $35.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Looker and The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Sign in
Login dialog


ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in or create an account
Login dialog
Loading comments…
ADVERTISEMENT