Trump Target Will Use MAGA Beauty Queen to Get Case Dropped
Lindsey Halligan was appointed after her predecessor objected to pursuing cases against Letitia James and James Comey.
XNY/Star Max/GC Images
New York Attorney General Letitia James plans to argue in court that Donald Trump unlawfully appointed the prosecutor who obtained her indictment.
James’ lawyers, in a court filing Thursday obtained by Reuters, told the judge in the case the charges against her should be dropped due to the circumstances of Lindsey Halligan’s appointment as U.S. Attorney in Eastern Virginia.
James said the charges against her are “baseless,” and that the indictment is “nothing more than a continuation of the president’s desperate weaponization of our justice system.”
Pacific Press/LightRocket via Getty Images
James, who is charged with one count of bank fraud and one count of making false statements to a bank over a mortgage on a second property of hers in Norfolk, Virginia, is scheduled to be arraigned there on Friday. She has denied wrongdoing.
Donald Trump appointed Halligan, a 36-year-old former personal attorney of his and Miss Colorado beauty pageant contestant, to her role after federal prosecutors felt investigations into James and former FBI Director James Comey hadn’t resulted in enough evidence to secure a conviction.
The 79-year-old president, who has publicly stated his desire to target each, pushed those prosecutors out and brought in Halligan.
Halligan's appointment was unlawful, Comey and James are both arguing.
MARCO BELLO/AFP via Getty Images
Halligan, who didn’t have any prosecutorial experience upon her appointment, was not joined by any other prosecutors when she presented the investigations into James and Comey to a grand jury.
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Comey was indicted last month on the charge of making a false statement and obstructing Congress. He too is challenging the legality of Halligan’s appointment.
James’ attorneys on Thursday made other comments about Halligan. In the court filing, they requested that Halligan—or any other prosecutor who joins the case—be appropriately punished for making statements about the case outside the court and legal filings.
On Monday, a reporter for Lawfare described a series of messages she had received from Halligan in which the Trump appointee criticized her social media posts about the James case. Halligan tried to claim—after the fact—that her messages were all off the record.
The Daily Beast has reached out to the DOJ and James’ office for comment.
See more of our coverage in your search results.
Got a tip? Send it to The Daily Beast here.
Unlock a year of full access to The Looker and The Daily Beast for $35.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Looker and The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Sign in
Login dialog
Sign in or create an account
Login dialog
Loading comments…