Trump Grants Futile Pardon to Jailed MAGA Election Denier
The president’s pardon of the controversial county clerk is largely symbolic, but could trigger a complicated legal battle.

Alex Wong/Getty Images
President Donald Trump announced in a Thursday Truth social rant that he would be pardoning the former Colorado elections clerk convicted of trying to overturn the 2020 election. But the pardon itself carries little force.
After accusing Democrats of “ignor[ing] violent and vicious crime of all shapes, sizes, colors, and types,” the president announced that he would be pardoning Tina Peters.
“Democrats have been relentless in their targeting of TINA PETERS, a Patriot who simply wanted to make sure that our Elections were Fair and Honest,” Trump wrote in the post.
“Tina is sitting in a Colorado prison for the ‘crime’ of demanding Honest Elections. Today I am granting Tina a full Pardon for her attempts to expose Voter Fraud in the Rigged 2020 Presidential Election!”

Donald Trump/Truth Social
Peters was convicted of seven charges, including tampering with voting machines, in 2024, having granted unauthorized individuals access to Mesa County voting machines in order to transfer data to Trump allies. She was then sentenced to nine years in prison.
Shortly after returning to the White House, the Trump administration took up her cause, with the Department of Justice going so far as to support her attempt to challenge her imprisonment on constitutional grounds.
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Earlier this month, the president criticized Colorado Gov. Jared Polis for refusing to allow an “elderly woman,” Peters, out of jail, in a scathing Truth Social post. At 70, Peters is nine years younger than Trump himself.

Tina Peters was sentenced to 9 years in prison for her role in attempting to overturn the 2020 election.
Marc Piscotty/Getty Images
“The SLEAZEBAG Governor of Colorado, Jared Polis, refuses to allow an elderly woman, Tina Peters, who was unfairly convicted of what the Democrats do, cheating on Elections, out of jail!” Trump wrote. “She was convicted for trying to stop Democrats from stealing Colorado Votes in the Election.”
On Tuesday, a federal judge dismissed Peters’ habeas corpus petition challenging her imprisonment as she awaits the outcome of her appeal, citing a Supreme Court case that prohibits federal courts from interfering with ongoing state criminal proceedings except in extraordinary circumstances.
The fact that Peters was convicted on state charges, not federal, also means that her charges are not pardonable by Trump, something reporters were quick to point out, with Politico’s senior legal affairs reporter Kyle Cheney calling the pardon “largely symbolic” as a result.

It is unclear whether or not the president's attempt to pardon Peters will actually succeed.
Kevin Mohatt/Reuters
Peters’ attorney, Peter Ticktin, had not been informed beforehand, according to PBS White House Correspondent Elizabeth Landers. He also said the news was “freaking fantastic.” He had sent a plea to the president just days earlier.
Asked by Landers whether he thought the presidential pardon was legal or would break precedent, Ticktin said that “the Constitution really needs to be read and understood” through “the eyes of the founders and what did they mean when they wrote it.”
In his nine-page letter to Trump asking for the president to pardon his client, Ticktin wrote, “The question of whether a president can pardon for state offenses has never been raised in any court.”
The president’s decision to attempt to grant a pardon will likely result in a legal battle on the question of whether the Constitution grants the president the power to pardon people for state crimes in addition to federal.
In a Thursday night interview with 9News’ Kyle Clark, Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser called the president’s attempted pardon of Peters a “lawless act,” adding, “It’s an act of intimidation. It has no basis in American law.”
“This president doesn’t respect the rule of law, but he doesn’t have authority to undermine how we operate our judicial system here in Colorado.”
Unlock a year of full access to The Looker and The Daily Beast for $35.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Looker and The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Sign in
Login dialog




ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in or create an account
Login dialog
Loading comments…
ADVERTISEMENT