Trump Goons Humiliated After Dropping Ultimate Revenge Plot
The case against the Democrats accused of sedition by Trump has reportedly been dropped.
U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office has decided to stop pursuing its case against the six Democrats who recorded a video urging soldiers and intelligence officers to defy unlawful orders, according to an NBC report.
The video, which featured Sens. Mark Kelly and Elissa Slotkin, as well as Reps. Maggie Goodlander, Jason Crow, Chris Deluzio, and Chrissy Houlahan, was released in November. In it, the lawmakers reminded service members of their oath to the Constitution and that they “can refuse illegal orders.”
According to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, members of the military are only obliged to obey lawful orders and must refuse illegal ones.
The video infuriated Republicans, particularly the White House, with Trump describing the video as “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!” and reposting calls from his supporters for the six Democrats to be hanged.

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi (L) and U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro.
Alex Wroblewski/AFP via Getty Images
The Trump administration attempted to launch multiple legal challenges against the Democrats involved, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth threatening to court-martial Sen. Kelly and formally censuring him, and the Department of Justice seeking a grand jury indictment, a move which was unsuccessful earlier this month after the grand jury found no evidence of a crime.
Following the failure to secure an indictment, Pirro’s office has decided to stop pursuing the case, three people familiar with the matter told NBC News.
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
While the case was abandoned in D.C., federal prosecutors in other jurisdictions could bring a case in their own jurisdictions, though NBC notes there has been no indication this will happen.
The Daily Beast has contacted the Department of Justice and the White House for comment. Spokespeople for Pirro and the White House declined to comment when contacted by NBC about whether or not the president and Pirro had discussed the case. A source familiar with the matter told NewsNation, “We have no plans to pursue” the case any further.

Donald Trump and his lackeys immediately began seeking revenge on the Democrats featured in the video, including Secretary Hegseth, who targeted Sen. Mark Kelly for retribution.
Joe Raedle/Getty Images
The Daily Beast has also contacted Sen. Kelly’s office for comment. After the DOJ failed to indict the six Democrats, Kelly posted on X that the attempt was “an outrageous abuse of power by Donald Trump and his lackies.”
“It wasn’t enough for Pete Hegseth to censure me and threaten to demote me, now it appears they tried to have me charged with a crime — all because of something I said that they didn’t like,” he continued. “That’s not the way things work in America.”
“Donald Trump wants every American to be too scared to speak out against him. The most patriotic thing any of us can do is not back down.”
Last month, Kelly filed a lawsuit against Hegseth for making him the target of an “unconstitutional and legally baseless” revenge plot.
“It appears that never in our nation’s history has the Executive Branch imposed military sanctions on a Member of Congress for engaging in disfavored political speech,” the lawsuit said.
Just one day after it was reported that the grand jury declined to invite Kelly and his fellow lawmakers, a Bush-appointed federal judge blocked Hegseth’s attempts to censure and demote Kelly for appearing in the video.

A judge rejected Hegseth's attempt to formally censure and demote Kelly, who served in the Navy for 24 years and as a NASA astronaut.
Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Imag
District Judge Richard Leon wrote in his opinion that while Hegseth was relying on a “well-established doctrine that military servicemembers enjoy less vigorous First Amendment protections,” it has never been established that this doctrine applies to retired servicemembers like Kelly.
“Unfortunately for Secretary Hegseth, no court has ever extended those principles to retired servicemembers, much less a retired servicemember serving in Congress and exercising oversight responsibility over the military. This Court will not be the first to do so!”
Kelly responded to the news with a video posted to social media in which he celebrated the ruling, but noted that the fight wasn’t over, because “Donald Trump has never been the kind of person to admit when he’s wrong.”
“Today’s ruling was a victory for free speech, but don’t expect Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth to give up. We have to keep standing up to this Administration when they undermine Americans’ rights,” Kelly wrote.
Unlock a year of full access to The Looker and The Daily Beast for $35.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Looker and The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Sign in
Login dialog



ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in or create an account
Login dialog
Loading comments…
ADVERTISEMENT