Trump DOJ Files Bonkers Motion to Keep Epstein Files Sealed
The Justice Department claims Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie’s request for an independent monitor is an overreach.
The Trump administration is seemingly pulling out all the stops to get out of releasing the remaining Epstein Files.
On Friday, Trump’s Department of Justice quietly filed a motion to block Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie’s request for an independent monitor to oversee the release of Epstein Files in the closed case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
In a new motion, the DOJ urged Judge Paul A. Engelmayer to reject the request, stating that the court had no authority to approve it because neither Khanna nor Massie were involved in the criminal case against Maxwell that landed her behind bars.
Khanna and Massie filed an amici curiae brief, typically done by individuals who are not parties in a case, with Engelmayer on Jan. 8. Engelmayer previously ordered the unsealing of grand jury materials in the Maxwell case in order to comply with ongoing release of investigative materials related to Epstein.

Massie, Khanna and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene during a news conference on the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
Heather Diehl/Getty Images
The letter was sent in an effort to push the Justice Department to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which the congressmen co-sponsored. The DOJ argued that the representatives were overreaching with their request to appoint an independent monitor to compel the release of documents.
In their initial filing, Reps. Khanna and Massie stated that they had “urgent and grave concerns about DOJ’s failure to comply with the Act as well as the Department’s violations of this Court’s order.” The Justice Department admitted earlier this month that it still had not released over 2 million documents related to Epstein.
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
In response to the new filing from the DOJ, Khanna told the Associated Press that the department “misconstrued” his request.
“We are informing the Court of serious misconduct by the Department of Justice that requires a remedy, one we believe this Court has the authority to provide, and which victims themselves have requested,” Khanna said in a statement to AP.

A photo of this image of Donald and Melania Trump alongside Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell was seen at Mar-a-Lago in 1997 and was temporarily pulled from the Epstein files release.
Davidoff Studios/Getty Images
The Daily Beast reached out to the DOJ, Khanna, and Massie for comment.
This latest development comes as lawmakers and the public have questioned the slow progress with and heavy redactions in the Epstein Files. The DOJ missed a key deadline to explain its redactions on Jan. 3, which was also the day that Trump executed an attack on Venezuela and captured its president.
“We are sure it’s just a coincidence, but today is the statutory date for the DOJ to explain its redactions in the Epstein file productions,” the Democrats on the House Oversight Committee wrote in an X post following the military operation in Venezuela. “We have not forgotten, and we won’t let up—regardless of the President’s new unconstitutional actions.”

The legislation Trump signed gives Attorney General Pam Bondi, a former personal attorney to Trump, broad leeway to redact information.
Roberto Schmidt/Getty Images
The Southern District of New York charged Epstein with sex trafficking in 2019. However, the disgraced financier was found dead of an “apparent suicide” in his Manhattan jail cell shortly after he was indicted. Maxwell was convicted and sentenced to 20 years in prison for trafficking underage girls for Epstein.
The DOJ received backlash after Maxwell was transferred to a cushy, minimum-security prison last year. The department was accused of giving Maxwell preferential treatment as Trump entertained the idea of giving the convicted sex offender a pardon.

Photo Illustration by Victoria Sunday/The Daily Beast/Getty Images
Photo Illustration by Victoria Sunday/The Daily Beast/Getty Images
Unlock a year of full access to The Looker and The Daily Beast for $35.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Looker and The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Sign in
Login dialog




ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in or create an account
Login dialog
Loading comments…
ADVERTISEMENT