How ‘Twitter Files’ Hearing Turned Into a Dumpster Fire for GOP
Congressional Republicans’ attempt to prove that Twitter was working with Democrats to conspire against conservatives just blew up in their faces in a spectacular way.
Photo Illustration by Thomas Levinson/The Daily Beast/Reuters
Republicans on Capitol Hill last week were keen to score points against Democrats by pushing the narrative that the federal government was working with Twitter to censor a New York Post story about Hunter Biden’s laptop.
However, in the process they conceded a spectacular own goal as it was revealed that it was in fact former President Donald Trump who had reached out to Twitter to have tweets removed that he found offensive—including one where model Chrissy Teigen called him a “pussy ass bitch.”
Mike Masnick, founder and editor of the Techdirt blog, told The New Abnormal the GOP was foolish to think the move wouldn’t backfire in the way they did.
“Clearly Republicans know that they’ve made these requests as well and so to put this into a congressional hearing and thinking that their own actions were not going to come out during the hearing, just seems like they have just this weird blind spot in recognizing how their own actions are going to come back and play out for them,” he said.
Subscribe to The New Abnormal on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Stitcher, Amazon Music, or Overcast.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Wednesday revealed that Twitter had actually changed its abusive content rules to avoid punishing Trump when he tweeted that she should “go back” to where she came from.
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
“There are many other examples of this, but this is one that happened to come out in the hearing of Twitter absolutely bending over backwards to help conservatives, which is like the exact opposite of what the hearing and tons of people keep insisting,” he said.
“How would the Republicans feel if the Democrats did the same thing and called Fox News executives into a hearing and demanded to know their editorial process and who did they put on the air and who did they refuse to put on the air? And how do they decide what their lead stories are? Like, everyone would see that as a very clear First Amendment problem because it’s Congress interfering with, you know, the First Amendment editorial process of a private company and yet that’s what happened with this hearing.”
See more of our coverage in your search results.
Got a tip? Send it to The Daily Beast here.
Unlock a year of full access to The Looker and The Daily Beast for $35.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Looker and The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Sign in
Login dialog