Sarah Silverman Sues ChatGPT Creator for Copyright Infringement
“If a user prompts ChatGPT to summarize a copyrighted book, it will do so,” the suit claims.

Lars Niki/Corbis via Getty Images
Sarah Silverman is suing OpenAI and Meta—the creators of AI language models ChatGPT and LLaMA, respectively—for stealing information from her book The Bedwetter, according to a pair of lawsuits filed Friday in a U.S. District Court.
Silverman joins fellow authors Richard Kadrey and Christopher Golden in the class-action copyright lawsuits, which claim that that both ChatGPT and LLaMA were trained on their books without the writers’ permission. The suits also allege that the models were likely fed the books from “shadow library” databases like Library Genesis and Z-Library.
“The books aggregated by these websites have also been available in bulk via torrent systems,” one suit claims, adding that, “these flagrantly illegal shadow libraries have long been of interest to the AI-training community.”
Exhibits attached to the OpenAI suit show that ChatGPT summarizes the authors’ books when prompted, producing a “derivative” work of virtually any copyrighted source.
“If a user prompts ChatGPT to summarize a copyrighted book, it will do so,” the suit claims.
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Most damningly, both suits suggest that the mere existence of these AI models are illegal under the Copyright Act since they need to be fed with potentially copyrighted information in order to work as anticipated.
The OpenAI suit questioned “whether ChatGPT itself is an infringing derivative work based on Plaintiffs’ copyrighted books.”
Similarly, the Meta suit alleges that the LLaMA models are “themselves infringing derivative works,” since they “cannot function without the expressive information extracted from the Plaintiffs’ Infringed Works.”
While these class-action suits only include the three plaintiffs, they allege that “there are at least thousands of members in the Class” around the United States whose copyrights are potentially being violated by the AI language models.
Lawyers at the Joseph Saveri Law Firm and attorney Matthew Butterick, who are representing the three authors, did not immediately respond to requests for comment from The Daily Beast.
Unlock a year of full access to The Looker and The Daily Beast for $35.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Looker and The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Sign in
Login dialog

