Pentagon Pete Sued by Navy Hero for ‘Chilling’ Message to Vets
Democratic Senator Mark Kelly claims he is the target of “extreme rhetoric and punitive retribution.”

Photo Illustration by Thomas Levinson/The Daily Beast/Getty
Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth is being sued by a former combat veteran who claims he was the victim of an unconstitutional revenge plot by the Trump administration after he urged military members to “refuse illegal orders.”
Navy veteran-turned-Senator Mark Kelly made the plea alongside five other Democratic lawmakers in a video last year, which prompted Donald Trump to accuse the group of “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!”

Trump and Hegseth were furious at the video, calling the Democrats who featured in it "the seditious six".
Joe Raedle/Getty Images
Hegseth, who initially threatened to court-martial Kelly, was also furious, and this month moved to censure the Arizona senator by downgrading his retirement rank and pay.
“As a retired Navy Captain who is still receiving a military pension, Captain Kelly knows he is still accountable to military justice. And the Department of War — and the American people — expect justice,” Hegseth wrote on X.
But in a 46-page lawsuit filed Monday, Kelly sought to block Hegseth’s actions, arguing they are “unconstitutional and legally baseless.”

Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) is one of the six Democratic lawmakers who enraged President Donald Trump.
Kent Nishimura/Getty Images
He also warned that such actions could have a “chilling” effect, leaving military veterans at risk of having their rank and pay downgraded years after they retire, simply for making comments that he or other defense secretaries dislike.
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
“It appears that never in our nation’s history has the Executive Branch imposed military sanctions on a Member of Congress for engaging in disfavored political speech,” the lawsuit says.
“If permitted to stand, the Secretary’s censure and the grade-determination proceedings that he has directed will inflict immediate and irreparable harm,” it adds.
“Each of these actions also signals to retired service members and Members of Congress that criticism of the Executive’s use of the armed forces may be met with retaliation through military channels.”
The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and names Hegseth, Navy Secretary John Phelan, and the Department of Defense as defendants.
It centers around a video that Kelly and five of his colleagues posted in November as tensions escalated over the administration’s lethal strikes against alleged drug boats and the military buildup near Venezuela.

Trump released a video showing the drug boat strike in the Caribbean on September 2.
Donald J Trump/Truth Social
At the time, the administration had justified the strikes by insisting that it was waging a war against “narco-terrorists” to stop the flow of drugs into the U.S.
Since then, however, U.S. forces have captured Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro, and Trump has made his motivations clear: to “run” Venezuela for the foreseeable future while seizing its oil as America asserts its dominance in the Western Hemisphere.
In the video, the Democratic lawmakers—all of whom have backgrounds in the military or intelligence—tell viewers: “We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now. Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk.
“This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens. Like us, you all swore an oath to protect and defend this Constitution. Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad but from right here at home. Our laws are clear: You can refuse illegal orders.”
However, Kelly, who retired as a Navy captain in 2011 after 25 years of service, was the only Democratic lawmaker among the six to face adverse action from the Defense Department.
The other five—Elissa Slotkin, Jason Crow, Chrissy Houlahan, Chris Deluzio and Maggie Goodlander—do not draw retirement pay from the military.
The Daily Beast has reached out to the Department of Defense, but it has yet to comment.
Unlock a year of full access to The Looker and The Daily Beast for $35.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Looker and The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Sign in
Login dialog



ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in or create an account
Login dialog
Loading comments…
ADVERTISEMENT