National Guard Accidentally Reveals How Much People Hate Trump’s D.C. Crackdown
An internal analysis mistakenly emailed to a newspaper also reveals that veterans and troops are shamed.

MEHMET ESER/MEHMET ESER/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images
The National Guard mistakenly sent an internal sentiment analysis to a newspaper, showing that most reactions to Trump’s D.C. takeover are adverse and risks widening a rift between troops and civilians.
Internal documents assessing news coverage and social media describe residents’ alarm, being a “wedge between citizens and the military,” according to The Washington Post, which inadvertently received them.

Not many people appear to like the National Guard being on D.C.'s streets.
MEHMET ESER/Mehmet Eser / Middle East Images via AFP
Veterans and troops view the deployment “with shame and alarm,” the documents read.
A Guard official acknowledged the assessment’s authenticity and said it was inadvertently emailed to the Post. It is unclear how many others received it.
The analysis found that social posts about the deployment were 53 percent negative, 45 percent neutral, and 2 percent positive.
It also catalogued troop fatigue and confusion as the mission threatens to stretch beyond a month, with more than 2,300 Guard members activated in the capital.
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
The Army, which is overseeing the deployment, did not provide a comment to The Post.
Trump insists the surge is needed to cut crime, but D.C. police data showed a decline before his August “emergency” declaration.

Were the National Guard really sent to D.C. to do gardening?
The Washington Post/Tom Brenner for The Washington Post via Getty Images
Since then, the Guard’s own daily updates have leaned on “beautification” work—mulch spreading, trash pickup, and fence painting—alongside occasional police assists, deepening questions over what, exactly, the soldiers are there to do.
Those questions are now playing out in court. In California, a federal judge ruled the administration’s Los Angeles deployment violated federal law.
The Ninth Circuit has paused that ruling while it reviews the case, allowing about 300 troops to remain. In D.C., the city sued to halt the mission, arguing it was an illegal “federal overreach.”
The documents also reference a separate Trump initiative—a standing National Guard “quick reaction force” (QRF) for civil unrest nationwide.
Planning documents reported last month by The Washington Post described hundreds of Guard troops on an hour’s deployment notice, and the White House later trumpeted an order directing the Pentagon to ensure a QRF is available.
Civil-military scholars have warned that politically motivated domestic call-ups risk long-term damage to public trust—and recruitment.
Yet the mulch keeps piling up. As one expert told the Post, the mission appears to be a misuse of military training rather than a cure for D.C. crime.
The Daily Beast has contacted the National Guard, the Army, and the White House for comment.
Unlock a year of full access to The Looker and The Daily Beast for $35.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Looker and The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Sign in
Login dialog



ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in or create an account
Login dialog
Loading comments…
ADVERTISEMENT