Justice Calls Out Trump as Danger to Supreme Court
Justice Elena Kagan reacted to Trump’s claim that SCOTUS is a “disgrace to our nation.”
Win McNamee/via REUTERS
Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan has called out President Donald Trump’s repeated attacks on the court as “dangerous.”
During congressional testimony alongside Amy Coney Barrett, Kagan, 66, was read quotes from the president by Sen. Jack Reed.
“I just want to pick up a point that Sen. Collins made about outrageous statements that are being made by public figures, and I can’t think of a more prominent one than the president of the United States,” Reed began. “On February 20, following your decision on tariffs, he said, ‘Disgrace to our nation. Fools. Lapdogs for the RINOs and radical left Democrats.’ ‘Very unpatriotic’ and ‘disloyal to the Constitution.’ He was describing the Supreme Court.”
The Rhode Island senator also quoted the president’s March 15 outburst: “‘Our country was unnecessarily ransacked by the United States Supreme Court, which is little more than a weaponized and unjust political organization.’”
Reed, a Democrat, concluded, “If there’s anyone in the country that commands more attention, it’s the president, and I think that behavior is very dangerous to the court and to our whole system, and I just want that to be part of the record.”
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Kagan did not mince her words in her response.
“Whatever political figure says them, whatever party that political figure is a member of, these statements are really unhelpful,” she said. “They’re dangerous in terms of individual justices’ security, and they’re not appropriate in the way to treat a coordinate branch of government.”
Kagan referenced Roberts' 2024 year-end report on the rise of threats against members of the court.
SHAWN THEW/via REUTERS
Kagan then referred to Chief Justice John Roberts’ 2024 year-end report, which detailed a rise in threats and harassment.
“He talked about how criticism is fair game... but intimidation is a different thing entirely, and when political figures of any stripe are trying to intimidate judges and justices to do things that they like rather than the things that they don’t, that’s where we really have crossed the line,” Kagan said.
Kagan and Barrett were testifying before the House and the Senate in support of the court’s request for an increase in security funding.
The request comes at a time when Supreme Court justices and judges nationwide increasingly face threats. Trump, 80, frequently complains about the court—sometimes singling out individual justices—when it rules against him.
In the court’s 6-3 ruling overturning Trump’s tariffs, two of his nominees, Neil Gorsuch and Barrett, joined Roberts and the court’s liberal wing in ruling against him.
Since then, the court has handed Trump losses on big issues like mail-in ballots and birthright citizenship. He has said he plans on requesting a rehearing of the latter case, the result of which was “absolutely insane,” he fumed. Barrett voted with the majority then, too, as did Trump nominee Brett Kavanaugh, though he didn’t believe Trump’s executive order was illegal.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
During Thursday’s hearing, Barrett, 54, talked about her experience facing threats while on the bench. In one instance, she was given a bulletproof vest.
U.S. Supreme Court justices Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan testify before a House Appropriations Financial Services and General Government Subcommittee hearing on the Supreme Court's annual budget request to Congress on Capitol Hill.
Evelyn Hockstein/Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters
“Maybe I lack imagination, but I didn’t expect that performing this service was going to put me in the position of explaining to my children what a bulletproof vest was and why I had to wear one,” she told lawmakers.
Barrett also spoke about the “swatting” incident at her Virginia home in May.
“One of my teenage sons opened the door to go out with friends and saw in our street, it was full of police cars who had responded to a false report of gunshots and raised voices in my home,” she said.
“I was very, very grateful that I had Supreme Court police outside my home because they were able to stop and meet with and explain to the county police that it had been a false alarm, and so the police did not actually attempt to enter our home.”
Unlock a year of full access to The Looker and The Daily Beast for $35.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Looker and The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Sign in
Login dialog

ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in or create an account
Login dialog
Loading comments…
ADVERTISEMENT