Judge Humiliates Trump’s DOJ in Ballroom Court Battle
The federal judge questioned the administration’s “brazen interpretation of the laws of vocabulary.”
A federal judge has rejected Donald Trump’s claim that his $400 million ballroom is a mere “alteration” to the White House.
At a hearing in D.C. on Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon repeatedly questioned the administration’s claims that the president does not need congressional approval for his super-sized vanity project.
Trump, 79, ordered the bulldozing of the entire East Wing of the White House to make way for the ballroom, fixating on the construction during a cost-of-living crisis and overseas military “excursions.”

Donald Trump gestures to the curtains behind which ballroom construction was taking place.
Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images
Lawyers for the Justice Department claimed a federal law allows Trump to make alterations and improvements “as the president may determine.”
Leon, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, said that labelling the construction of the ballroom as “an alteration… takes some brazen interpretation of the laws of vocabulary,” according to CNN.
The judge also pushed back on a technicality that the White House falls under the authority of the National Park Service, which has approved the extravagant construction.
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
“This isn’t any national park,” Leon said. “This is an iconic symbol of this nation.”

An image of how Trump's ballroom will look.
The White House
The National Trust for Historic Preservation, a nonprofit charged by Congress with preserving historic buildings, previously asked Leon to issue a temporary injunction to halt construction until congressional approval is granted.
The judge said he would make his ruling on by the end of March, but flagged that the losing side would no doubt make an appeal. Above-ground work on the ballroom has been earmarked by the Trump administration to begin in April.
Leon noted, “It would have been a heck of a lot easier by any standard to have just gone to Congress to get the authority to do it,” calling out the government’s “shifting theories and shifting dynamics.”

An excavator works to clear rubble after the demolition of East Wing of the White House last October.
Eric Lee/Getty Images
As recently as Monday, Trump was gushing over the latest cosmetic tweaks to the 90,000-square-foot project, which has blown out in costs and is not expected to be completed before his second term as president ends.
For comparison, the primary White House structure, the Executive Mansion, is just 55,000 square feet.
“I build great stuff,” Trump said during a rambling Kennedy Center board meeting in the White House. “We have a magnificent ballroom being built.”
He went on: “It‘s going to be on time, on budget. It‘s going to be under budget. Literally, we are having it under budget, other than we have upgraded it in terms of the marbles we are using. We are using onyx and stones that are incredible. But it will be something really spectacular.”
The East Wing was demolished in October in preparation for Trump's ballroom.
Kevin Lamarque/REUTERS
Trump’s gloating over the ballroom follows a damning public verdict on his pet project released earlier this month.
Over 32,000 people submitted digital and handwritten notes to the National Capital Planning Commission, which is overseeing the construction.
Around 97 percent of 9,000 comments from the public are anti-ballroom, according to a CNN analysis.
Terms used by the public to describe Trump’s beloved ballroom include “gaudy,” “garish,” “ostentatious,” “obscene,” “hideous,” “disgusting,” “vulgar,” “cheap,” “low class,” and “travesty.”
Unlock a year of full access to The Looker and The Daily Beast for $35.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Looker and The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Sign in
Login dialog




ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in or create an account
Login dialog
Loading comments…
ADVERTISEMENT