Fuming Judges Deploy Nuclear Tactic to Fight Trump Admin
Federal judges are getting fed up with with the administration ignoring their court orders.

Aaron Schwartz/Getty Images
Dozens of judges have demanded that lawyers representing President Donald Trump’s administration explain why the government shouldn’t be held in contempt for failing to follow court orders involving detained migrants.
A new review by The New York Times found at least 35 cases since August where a federal district court or magistrate judge issued a so-called “show cause” order requiring the government to explain why it shouldn’t be punished for violating the orders.
The show cause order is basically the government’s last chance to explain itself before being held in contempt.

Attorney General Pam Bondi's DOJ has attacked judges in response to criticism about the administration's failure to follow court orders.
Joe Readle/Getty Images
The spike in the orders is proof that judges are getting angry with officials as they try to determine whether the violations are intentional or an unfortunate by-product of a legal system that has been overwhelmed by Trump’s mass deportation agenda, according to the Times.
“We’re at a moment where the courts are trying to figure out whether the Trump administration is systematically ignoring court orders, or whether it’s a function of overload plus incompetence plus an attitude of disrespect,” Harvard law professor Noah Feldman told the Times.
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Both publicly and privately, some of the leadership at Pam Bondi’s Department of Justice have signaled the department is not overly concerned with following court orders, the Times noted.
In a statement to the Daily Beast, a DOJ spokesperson blamed Joe Biden’s administration and “rogue judges” for the overwhelming caseloads.
“If rogue judges followed the law in adjudicating cases and respected the Government’s obligation to properly prepare cases, there wouldn’t be an ‘overwhelming’ habeas caseload or concern over the [Department of Homeland Security] following orders,” the statement said.
It added that the number of people being detained by ICE is “a direct result of this Administration’s strong border security policies to keep the American people safe.”
Judges, however, are getting fed up after weeks of false testimony, shoddy legal arguments, and failure to comply with court orders, according to the Times.
Last week, U.S. District Judge Sunshine Sykes, a Biden appointee, blasted the Trump administration for its mandatory detention policy, which has been struck down in more than 1,600 cases and has led to a flood of habeas corpus petitions from immigrants saying they’re being wrongfully held.

President Trump's deportation drive and mandatory detention policy have led to thousands of habeas corpus cases.
CHARLY TRIBALLEAU/Charly Triballeau/AFP via Getty Images
Administration officials “have chosen to avail themselves of these exact circumstances of which they now complain,” Sykes wrote in a sweeping decision demanding the government follow her previous orders.
Another judge wrote in a scathing ruling that “agents of the federal government—masked, anonymous, armed with military weapons, operating from unmarked vehicles, acting without warrants of any kind—are seizing persons for civil immigration violations and imprisoning them without any semblance of due process.”
The practice is “an assault on the constitutional order,” and is exactly what the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution was written to prevent, wrote Judge Joseph R. Goodwin, a Clinton appointee.
But last week, a judge took the extraordinary step of holding a military attorney on loan to the DOJ, which has hemorrhaged attorneys since Trump began his mass deportation drive, in civil contempt over the treatment of an immigrant released from ICE custody.

Protesters nationwide have demonstrated against ICE's tactics, including at a march in Minneapolis, Minnesota, in January.
Roberto Schmidt/AFP via Getty Images
U.S. District Judge Laura Provinzino ordered attorney Matthew Isihara to pay a $500 daily fine until identification documents were returned to Rigoberto Soto Jimenez, a legal U.S. resident who was arrested as part of Operation Metro Surge in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Isihara apologized to the judge and said the case had fallen through the cracks.
On Thursday, Jimenez’s lawyer received an overnight FedEx package, and the judge lifted her contempt order.
Unlock a year of full access to The Looker and The Daily Beast for $35.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Looker and The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Sign in
Login dialog



ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in or create an account
Login dialog
Loading comments…
ADVERTISEMENT