CNN Legal Guru Uses Vance’s Education to Call BS on His ICE Shooting Rant
The vice president was called out for defending the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis.
JD Vance is facing backlash for claiming an ICE agent involved in a fatal shooting is protected by “absolute immunity”—an assertion experts say is particularly bizarre since the vice president went to law school.
Elliot Williams, formerly a deputy assistant attorney general at the Justice Department for the Obama administration, spoke out on CNN after the vice president defended the actions of the officer who shot 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis on Wednesday.
Vance declared that the ICE agent was engaging in “federal law enforcement action” at the time of the shooting and claimed he therefore was shielded from any legal blowback, echoing the Department of Homeland Security’s narrative that the fatal shooting was an act of “self-defense.”

A portrait of Renee Nicole Good pasted to a light pole near the site of her shooting in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Stephen Maturen/Getty Images
“That’s a federal issue. That guy is protected by absolute immunity. He was doing his job,” Vance told reporters at the White House on Thursday.
In a brutal takedown on Friday morning, CNN’s Williams suggested the vice president was deliberately lying to the public with this claim.
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
“That is not correct, and the vice president of the United States went to literally the most prestigious law school on the planet and knows that that’s not accurate,” the network’s legal analyst said.
“Now, certainly law enforcement officers enjoy tremendous and very broad immunity for the actions that they carry out on the job, and they should, because they have to make very stressful on-the-spot decisions without the benefit of hindsight that we all have watching things on TikTok,” said Williams.
“That said, when someone steps far outside the bounds of either state or local law or, frankly, even their own guidelines as law enforcement officials, absolutely, they can be held accountable both by the agency they work for or state, local or federal authorities.”
Williams added: “So that’s just simply not an accurate statement from the vice president.”

A U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent shot and killed an American woman on the streets of Minneapolis on Jan. 7.
CHARLY TRIBALLEAU/AFP via Getty Images
The Daily Beast has contacted Vance’s office for comment.
Vance’s claim of “absolute immunity” has been met with a torrent of skepticism from experts. While the Trump administration has insisted Good “weaponized” her vehicle, footage from the scene contradicts that version of events, with her vehicle shown pulling away from the ICE agent as he opens fire.
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey has vowed to “do everything possible to get to the bottom of this, to get justice, and to make sure that there is an investigation that is conducted in full.” State authorities say their criminal investigators have been blocked from investigating by Trump officials, however.
Good was one of four people killed in ICE raids since Trump’s immigration crackdown began last year, according to an analysis by nonprofit news outlet The Trace.
Citing data from the Gun Violence Archive and reports from news outlets, The Trace documented 31 incidents overall since the Trump administration’s crackdown began in July in which immigration agents either shot someone or pointed guns at individuals.
The outlet found that at least three people were shot while observing or documenting immigration raids, while five others were wounded as they attempted to flee traffic stops or evade enforcement operations.
The figures “are likely an undercount, as shootings involving immigration agents are not always publicly reported,” the outlet reported.
Unlock a year of full access to The Looker and The Daily Beast for $35.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Looker and The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
Sign in
Login dialog




ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in or create an account
Login dialog
Loading comments…
ADVERTISEMENT