Cheat Sheet

The Best In Brief

2009
11
22
NOVEMBER 2009
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
 
 
 
 
 
BLUE TO RED

GOP Wins Both Governor Races

HP Main - McDonnell Wins
Mark Wilson / Getty Images

Republicans swept Tuesday's gubernatorial races, with Bob McDonnell easily winning in Virginia and Chris Christie squeaking ahead of incumbent Jon Corzine in New Jersey. The New Jersey loss is a big blow for Democrats, as President Obama had campaigned heavily for Corzine. And results reverse a trend for Virginia, which has had Democratic governors for the past eight years and last year, for the first time in 44 years, went blue to elect Barack Obama. Leading up to the election, pundits speculated that a Republican gubernatorial sweep could indicate dissatisfaction with the administration in Washington, but exit polls indicated that voting reflected feelings about the economy, not Obama. Exit polls showed that 89 percent of voters in New Jersey, and 85 percent in Virginia, were "very" worried about the economy for the upcoming year.

Posted at 11:37 PM, Nov 3, 2009
Save it
  |  
Email
  |  
Facebook
  |  
Twitter
  |  
Digg
  |     |  
print
  |  
Cheat Sheet Worthy?
Thumb Up
(%)  |  
Thumb Down
(%)    
Comments ()
case1234

That makes 9 elections in a row where VA has elected a Gov. opposite the party in the Whitehouse. Doesn't that strike as a pattern worth mentioning by the media?

Also, Obama was not on the ballot. Just a guy who ran an ineffective campaign against one who did. Saying this is all about Obama personally (not even about the party) is like saying you could have stuck two sacks of potatoes across from each other with the letters (R) and (D) and have the people vote. That is not the case. Candidates do matter.

|
|
Reply
|
8:57 pm, Nov 3, 2009
osea65

HUH???????

|
|
Reply
|
9:08 pm, Nov 3, 2009
Plantagenet

Good to see that bankster Corzine goin' down in New Jersey. Obama campaigned heavily in New Jersey for his crony from Goldman Sachs, and Corzine spent over 25 million dollars of his personal fortune trying to get himself re-elected.....but this time the people of New Jersey were not for sale to the highest bidder.

|
10:35 pm, Nov 3, 2009
case1234

Yep, it was all over for Reagan and Bushs' when their parties lost big in the off year elections....

Whats funny is every time for both Dems and the GOP the media is Shocked, just Shocked when this happens even though it happens in nearly EVERY election cycle.

|
10:52 pm, Nov 3, 2009
crymeariver

case1234: Whats funny is every time for both Dems and the GOP the media is Shocked, just Shocked when this happens even though it happens in nearly EVERY election cycle.
---------------------------------
LOL!

It's called trying to fill up the empty media airtime by trying to create drama where none exists.

|
12:56 am, Nov 4, 2009
FatFreddy

Plantagenet,

In case you didn't know: From US News and world Report 1998

"Corzine did not fit the traditional mold of the well-connected financier who went to the right schools; he was born and raised in a southern Illinois farmhouse. Until his sudden resignation last week, he was preparing to offer shares to the public through an IPO. But the collapse of stock markets around the world, along with personality conflicts with top Goldman brass, took its toll. Heavy trading losses in 1998 caused Goldman's earnings to sink 80 percent. Perhaps more troubling for a firm that prides itself on camaraderie, Goldman insiders report that Corzine never got along with recently named co-CEO Henry Paulson Jr. (left). Paulson may consolidate the executive suite and continue Corzine's plan to go public by year's end."

|
6:40 am, Nov 4, 2009
spotted

Uh, the pattern was mentioned this morning on MSNBC.

That's why no one is surprised by this result.

|
|
Reply
|
9:18 pm, Nov 3, 2009
DD3075

But the Repubs swept the top 3 spots, Gov., Lt. Gov., and Attorney Gen.

That is surprisingly unusual. Nobody predicted that.

|
10:27 pm, Nov 3, 2009
diamondgirl

CNN and MSNBC were practically stuttering and crying, I couldnt wait to turn them on to see how they would spin it...It's a great day in America!

|
10:54 pm, Nov 3, 2009
nightdragon09

Spotted... glad you mentioned MSNBC... I flipped over to them shortly after 10pm when Chris Christie had been declared the winner and Corzine was moments away from giving his concession speech... and what to my (non) surprise was on MSNBC? Live coverage of tonight's events with unbiased commentary and up-to-the-minute election results, you say?

Nope... just a re-run of Bathtub Boy's earlier show! Somehow I doubt that would have been the case had the Dem candidates won in NJ and Virginia.

NOW tell me how biased "Faux News" is and how "fair and balanced" PMSNBC really is!

|
11:26 pm, Nov 3, 2009
SocialSecretion

come on dragon, you can't just make thungs up. I watched maddow doing live coverage of results and accurate reporting all through the night.

|
12:05 am, Nov 4, 2009
AlanD2

Sorry, nightdragon09. "Fair and balanced" is a Fox News trademark - and lie.

MSNBC certainly has a liberal bias, at least in the evening (Morning Joe is your guy), but it does not lie like Fox News does.

|
12:21 am, Nov 4, 2009
nightdragon09

Sorry SocialSecretion (ewww!)... I had already switched over to the alphabet networks for my local news long before 11pm rolled around... see, I had already gotten complete coverage of the NJ election from all the local stations as well as every cable news station EXCEPT for PMSNBC from 10-11pm... apparently re-runs of Bathtub Boy's Obama Hosannah hour were more important for some of you libs on here, but not for me.

|
12:30 am, Nov 4, 2009
nightdragon09

AlanD2... care to back up your "Fox News lies" statement with actual facts, or is that above your pay-grade or something?

Oh, I just remembered an example... remember when Fox constantly repeated the false Rush Limbaugh comments about slavery and James Earl Ray in just about all of their prime-time lineups while citing them from such credible sources as Wikipedia and random lefty blog posts?

Oh wait... that was CNN and MSNBC. Never mind.

|
12:39 am, Nov 4, 2009
diamondgirl

Fox news was disappointing to me, they didn't focus on the the elections as much as they were doing their own regular shows... CNN had more people talking about it than Fox Did...MSNBC had Keith and Rachel shows on, and were blasting the Republicans the whole time, bringing up all the failures of their party... But the good news VA & NJ won. I live in NJ and no way did I think a Republican would get past the BIG Democrat Get out the Vote Machine... Surprise Surprise, The Republicans had a get out the vote machine running full steam this time, I think it made a big difference for them..

|
9:05 am, Nov 4, 2009
Granite

Agreed. Everyone is reading waaay too much into this.

|
|
Reply
|
9:23 pm, Nov 3, 2009
wolverine1987

Yes, that's what every democrat is saying tonight. Here is the real story of the sweep--independents voted OVERWHELMINGLY for the republican candidates, by 25% in Virginia, 20% in Jersey. This is a massive shift on independent voters, who resoundingly backed Obama last year, moving away from the democrats.

|
10:50 pm, Nov 3, 2009
kord81

"wolverine1987" by independents you mean those people who don't want to call themselves republicans because they don't want to look bad. Look the only polls that matter for Obama is the one that will take place come 2012. By then you will know if your so called "independents" shift away from him.

|
11:12 pm, Nov 3, 2009
nightdragon09

Actually kord81... it was the registered Dems who didn't want to look bad by voting for Corzine, so they sat home. Voter turnout among heavily Democratic areas in NJ like Camden and Newark was drastically lower that it was last year, and Christie won southern, more Republican-leaning counties by huge margins, where voter turnout was just as high as it was during last year's presidential election.

|
11:40 pm, Nov 3, 2009
LeftCoastRightBrain

Granite-

Good call.

This is interesting. It's not a "trend" and 2010 is still a long way off. Lots of time left for both Reps and Dims to further muck things up. We keep ACORN out of the 2010 vote and the voters will actually get to make choices. We'll see what we'll see.

|
11:50 am, Nov 4, 2009
LostPatriot

Yes, waaaaay too much. In my state I voted for a democratic senator because he expressed that he was against the illegal Iraq invasion. One of his first votes after he was in office was to vote to continue the Iraq killing spree. When I asked him why he voted to continue the killing he replied he did it because he "loved the troops". So I asked, "if you love the troops then bring them home" He gave no reply. Our other democrat senator has been bought and paid for by the insurance industry. They have given him over 4 million dollars (Max Baucus). So please tell me what difference it makes whether it's a democrat or republican in office. They are all under control of the fascists. We have a fascist government. It needs to be broken up and decentralized before the "people" will ever regain power over their destinies. Obama has followed in the Bush footsteps simply because he is doing what he is told to do by the fascists. In fact he has expanded upon some of the Bush illicit and immoral programs going against his campaign promises

|
11:59 am, Nov 4, 2009
Plantagenet

Congrats to the Republicans for winning in Virginia. Obama's teleprompter readings didn't have quite the electrifying effect this time that they did just a year ago.

|
|
Reply
|
9:31 pm, Nov 3, 2009
oldpunk

Bleat Bleat Bleat Teleprompter Bleat Bleat Bleat Teleprompter Bleat Bleat Bleat Teleprompter..................Yawn

|
11:09 pm, Nov 3, 2009
allonfla

Hey Plant, did you know that his approval ratings are still high in VA and that more than 55% percent of the people who voted said that O's record did not affect their decision? Of course you didn't.

Anyways, Congratulations!! Keep your head high so that next year we can bury you.

|
11:37 pm, Nov 3, 2009
AlanD2

allonfla: I would like to agree with you, but 2010 does not look like a good year for Democrats.

I think we will have to wait for 2012, and Obama's reelection, to bury Republican aspirations.

Palin for President in 2012 - the Democratic dream!

|
12:18 am, Nov 4, 2009
elldeen

Plant, you and others like you seriously need to drop this stupid teleprompter shit. It has become so damn old and tired. Do you realize how idiotic you sound for constantly bringing it up? If other presidents before Obama have also used this contraption, then why can't he? SO WHAT IN HELL IS YOUR PROBLEM WITH THAT!!

|
|
Reply
|
10:44 pm, Nov 3, 2009
crymeariver

They believe that Obama is receiving messages from the teleprompter that's why they started the "war on teleprompter". If Obama used the same pen when giving a speech, they would start a "war on pens". Republicans are stupid that way. And Plant is dumber than most.

|
1:02 am, Nov 4, 2009
NewyorkerR

and the libs need to drop the Bush blame game

|
6:04 am, Nov 4, 2009
GateKeeper

@ elldeen..

because Plant-A-Lie..has nothing else relevant to say about President Obama.. in fact .it's ignorance and idiotic!..

When in fact President Geo W Bush Jr., used a telepromter EVERY single TIME he spoke.. so not to appear dumber than he was speaking like a 4th grader..he HID the telepromters behind the camera he faced and read like a 4th grader..

.and so President Obama is not a hinding the telepromter to insight his speeches....neither did Geo W H Bush Sr., hid the a telepromter..or other republican presidents.. what is plant - a Lie's point to continue to mention about a telepromter and president Obama.. its senselss.. more a narcissistic behaviour....

|
9:25 am, Nov 4, 2009
pricklypear

And what's wrong wid that?

|
|
Reply
|
12:37 am, Nov 4, 2009
winston1

cry If obama is receiving messages on his telepromter who's ever on the other end should be FIRED.

|
4:17 am, Nov 4, 2009
Charlemagne712

no, atleast 10 elections in a row. republican with clinton, 8 dems with bush, and now this year

|
|
Reply
1:15 am, Nov 4, 2009
barrett

Obama was all over New Jersey. Democrats have a problem with disillusionment. Who can forget Barney Frank crusading for financial institutions and the lending bust after the banks were bailed out. Now they'll complain we don't appreciate how they saved the economy.

They're clueless, really clueless.

|
|
Reply
3:32 pm, Nov 4, 2009
osea65

You DINOs were saying? I thought The Republican Party was dead? Winning in three important states like these looks and sounds pretty Alive to me!!!! Ahhh the agony of defeat, mmm and the Taste of Victoryyy. "Early exit polls conducted by CNN, indicated that voting didn't reflect feelings about Obama". I mean: HELLOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!! Who the hell do they think they are Kidding????? The honeymooon is so incredibly over and I couldn't be happier!!!!!

|
|
Reply
|
9:18 pm, Nov 3, 2009
NewyorkerR

well said

|
|
Reply
|
10:01 pm, Nov 3, 2009
elldeen

I wouldn't get too happy about this if I were you and osea 65. You righties put way too much stock in polls, and they can change like the weather or the stock market.

|
10:50 pm, Nov 3, 2009
Desertpenguin

elldeen--

You are so right.

It feels like everyday someone here mentions a new poll.

|
3:45 am, Nov 4, 2009
theoPitt

elld-

Say what you will, but if you go back and read the posts of the liberal TDBers there is no doubt that they felt the GOP was bound for "the Ash Heap of History". I do believe that phrase was typed a few thousand times by the haters on this site

|
8:13 am, Nov 4, 2009
djanimaequeen

It means that dens will keep control of congress since va votes in the opposite party. Nice try sparky. You can keep your 2 cents while I hang on to my hundred dollar bill.

|
|
Reply
|
10:16 pm, Nov 3, 2009
DD3075

Better yet, sparky can keep 2 cents and you can keep the "change".

|
10:30 pm, Nov 3, 2009
djanimaequeen

Your attempt to be clever failed miserably. Just thought you should know.

|
10:39 pm, Nov 3, 2009
Warehouseone

yeah right.
the real tests come next year.

|
|
Reply
10:19 pm, Nov 3, 2009
AlanD2

Winners in three important states, osea65? Republicans lost in New York district 23. Or had you forgotten already?

|
|
Reply
|
12:16 am, Nov 4, 2009
winston1

AlanD New Jersey and Virgina are the BIG ones thats all we care about. I guess the Tea Bag protesters are more important then you thought, they came out in full force. This is the will of the people, they have spoken and this is just the beginning.

|
4:25 am, Nov 4, 2009
crymeariver

Yes, I alway think about the President when I go to vote for the Governor of my state. Ditto with the Mayor, school board and CEO of the company I invest in.

|
|
Reply
1:04 am, Nov 4, 2009
NewyorkerR

2010 is the midterm and the real ass whipping time

|
|
Reply
6:06 am, Nov 4, 2009
Jaygim

I'm waiting for Corzine -- and his sacks of Goldman cash on layaway -- to down, like the Titanic.

|
|
Reply
9:19 pm, Nov 3, 2009
GateKeeper

..these LOCAL elections tonite has nothing to do with president obama..

..these LOCAL election(s) results have to do with the dislike of congress..which consist of democracts AND republicans..

.. the state of VA.. mid term VOTERS has more> than not ..voted contrary to the White House at present......so nothing NEW there.. if you are informed you know this..

..and so Senator Warner of VA(democractic) is given high praise in VA by both parties .

..and how many democractic govenors have VA elected when the White House belonged to the republicans? And vice versa?..nothing NEW there either..

.. VA is noted as a conservative red state(minus northern VA).. so these local elections as glee as it may be for the PUBS.. is not a referendum on President Obama as President..

So as it seems.. the PUBS playing up these LOCAL elections as a COMEBACK..is laugh-able to say there's going to be a
a SWEEP in congress as DIRECT OPPOSITION to president OBAMA.. is idealistic at best..subjective>glee wishful thinking..

|
|
Reply
|
9:26 pm, Nov 3, 2009
Glenda1976

Good try Gatekeeper,

Obama put his neck on the line for Corzine. This is a major repudiation of the dem tax & spend socialist agenda.

|
|
Reply
|
10:31 pm, Nov 3, 2009
kord81

So glenda put it in plain English what does the government spend taxes on and what are they used for?. And while you at it what are these socialist agenda you speak of?

|
11:20 pm, Nov 3, 2009
AlanD2

Glenda: Why do you prefer the Republican "borrow and spend" strategy over the Democratic "tax and spend" one?

You do remember that Reagan, Bush 41, and Bush 43 raised our national debt by $9 trillion, don't you? Your kids and grandchildren will be paying for this all their lives.

|
12:14 am, Nov 4, 2009
GateKeeper

@yGlenda1976

your party still lost a congressional seat..regardless..

|
9:32 am, Nov 4, 2009
ukeman

Ahh come on gate, since when did logic matter to the nut jobs?

|
|
Reply
10:40 pm, Nov 3, 2009
DD3075

I get such a kick out of you libs. If anything bad happens, that shows Americans are not pleased with the Dems, you always simply dismiss it.

You dismissed the tea parties, you dismissed the self-identified Marxist czar with the criminal record who had to resign (Van Jones), you dismiss Anita Dunn announcing she follows Mao, you dismiss the entire first 10 months of an ineffective administration, you dismiss the fact that our taxes are paying for 22 assistants for the first lady during a recession (when most other first ladies had 1), etc.

Is there ANY reality that Dems and libs accept? Or do you find safety in your little alternate reality? Denial has no long term gains.

As for the conservatives, don't get too cocky. I want results from these guys who were elected. Otherwise, these wins are temporary. McDonnell and Christy have to succeed.

|
|
Reply
|
10:48 pm, Nov 3, 2009
kord81

Sorry DD3075 there is no such thing as conservatism in this country....gosh! you people are delusional. Calling the other side "libs" doesn't make you a conservative. If you can find me the last Republican president who called himself a conservative and never raised taxes, or actually balanced the budget then I think you are genius.

|
11:16 pm, Nov 3, 2009
laughorcryagain

nu-uh gatekeeper
speak for yourself gae

I voted against corzine because of taxes, a local issue

but for the rest of the things on the ballot I voted straight republican without even knowing them or the issues, simply my own referendum against the dangerous dems in DC

eg, i dont really give a damn who the sheriff is, but i voted for the republican

call me an idiot but it doesn change the validity of my vote

|
|
Reply
|
9:57 pm, Nov 3, 2009
Warehouseone

I think you still proved gatekeepers point. You said yourself: "I voted
against corzine because of taxes, a local issue"
How is voting for a republican sheriff a referendum against dems here in DC?

|
|
Reply
|
10:24 pm, Nov 3, 2009
crymeariver

It isn't, he just likes saying that his vote about LOCAL issues somehow has to do with the Whitehouse. It doesn't. ALL POLITICS IS LOCAL.

|
1:06 am, Nov 4, 2009
GateKeeper

@ warehouseone..

i..sn't that what i said in my initial comment?.. exactely what laughorcryagain did as a voter and what many voters did upon a local election.. when it was the PUBS.. under the bush administration that bailed the banks out on wall street on a covert stimulus package.. when in fact president obama inherited a deficit higher than any decicit this nation has seen given by the republicans?... when in fact clinton gave president BUSH a surplus economy?...and all BUSH did with the surplus was bankrupt this nation.. you PPL never learn..

|
9:42 am, Nov 4, 2009
Honchos

Well, I guess that settles it. The Dems have had a pretty good run of it since last year what with winning control of the executive branch and both houses of congress but if the Republicans have the Governor's mansion in Virgina... well, the party's over. Governor of Virginia _is_ the highest office and most important elected position in America, after all.

|
|
Reply
|
10:00 pm, Nov 3, 2009
AlanD2

Honchos: You mean Fox News commentators aren't elected?

|
|
Reply
12:11 am, Nov 4, 2009
crymeariver

LOL!

|
|
Reply
1:06 am, Nov 4, 2009
NewyorkerR

Congratulation to the winners in VA 2010 here we come

|
|
Reply
|
10:02 pm, Nov 3, 2009
AlanD2

NewyorkerR: Don't count your chickens before they hatch in 2010 and 2012.

Palin for President!

|
|
Reply
12:10 am, Nov 4, 2009
MaliciousDisorder

Last year James Carvell said Virginia is now and forever a blue state. Sooo funny !

|
|
Reply
|
10:27 pm, Nov 3, 2009
crymeariver

Really? Link please?

|
|
Reply
1:07 am, Nov 4, 2009
NewyorkerR

well congratulations to Chris Christie NJ is The winner for sure. hope my taxes go down

|
|
Reply
|
10:35 pm, Nov 3, 2009
case1234

Please state which services you are willing to give up for that to happen....

|
|
Reply
|
11:19 pm, Nov 3, 2009
pricklypear

You should not spend money you do not have. Didn't your mom and dad teach you that?
Sometimes it's necessary to tighten your belt and sacrifice. It's a fact of life, case1234

|
12:54 am, Nov 4, 2009
crymeariver

You didn't answer the question Prickly. If you want your taxes lower which services do you want the state to stop delivering?? That's the problem with you "conservatives". Like Bush, you want tax-cuts but services to remain the same or add on more things which leads to unbalanced budgets and increased deficits. You want to have your cake and eat it too.

|
1:10 am, Nov 4, 2009
LeftCoastRightBrain

Maybe you start looking for efficiencies of operation. Maybe you look at union contracts. Maybe you look at why each level of government has a diversity office. Maybe you look to privatize some government services. Maybe you look at the way tax payer dollars are allocated to the school districts (not pretty and run by the NJ Supreme Court). Maybe you furlough state employees two days a month. Maybe you put in a hiring freeze, offer early retirement (the unions will love that one). Maybe you propose legislation that prohibits state workers from unionizing.

Just some back of the napkin thoughts.

|
12:02 pm, Nov 4, 2009
AlanD2

NewyorkerR: Given the current economic crisis, your hope has about the same chance as a snowball in hell.

|
|
Reply
|
12:09 am, Nov 4, 2009
pricklypear

Vote the sombitches out.

|
12:55 am, Nov 4, 2009
NewyorkerR

the better question is what do i get for my money. a little 850sqf house on a tiny lot50'x75' and the taxses are over $15,000 not fair

|
|
Reply
|
6:12 am, Nov 4, 2009
FatFreddy

You're crazy. Where do live, Morristown, Haddonfield? A friend of mine owns a house in Haddonfield worth about $700,000 and pays about $25,000. Complain to your Mayor and Town Council. They set the tax rates and assessments.

|
6:46 am, Nov 4, 2009
NewyorkerR

I live in NY but have a home in wildwood Crest The house is worth about $450.000

|
8:24 am, Nov 4, 2009
FatFreddy

WTF? What do you expect for a vacation home down the shore?

|
4:23 pm, Nov 4, 2009
pricklypear

You can blame me, I voted.

|
|
Reply
10:36 pm, Nov 3, 2009
NewyorkerR

me to for CC

|
|
Reply
10:37 pm, Nov 3, 2009
ukeman

Oh right; so again the MSM is 100 % wrong and Faux News is right.
It was predictable the Repubs would win and not be a referendum on Obama.
Also predictable; the crowing and beating of wing nutty chests.

the referendum is 2010.
go ahead and count your eggs; it's a free country.

I hope this is a wake up call for the WH, and not more obliviousness to issues that count with progressives, who put Obama in.

|
|
Reply
|
10:38 pm, Nov 3, 2009
Plantagenet

Its more likely that Obama will abandon the progressives and return to the center.

Thats what Clinton did when the democrats lost in 1994.

|
|
Reply
|
11:58 pm, Nov 3, 2009
Carole65

I doubt it, Plant. I think that the 2010 elections will determine Obama's position on issues. Clinton was more politically astute. I'm still waiting for Obama to call the shots............

|
12:12 am, Nov 4, 2009
jus1drun

the message is in the votes of the independents and it's all about jobs. don't know if the dems can quiet there own base long enough to venture away from health reform and concentrate on jobs. dems have a problem.

|
|
Reply
|
10:55 pm, Nov 3, 2009
ukeman

i'm jus1drun where the "other side"s jobs are; ya know, since they free marketed them all away and such...

|
|
Reply
|
11:11 pm, Nov 3, 2009
jus1drun

if they keep winning it'll be their problem but the dems are still up to bat.

|
11:57 pm, Nov 3, 2009
winston1

Carole65 Obama cannot call the shots, being his only experience was community organizer, he lacks the experience and knowledge to govern.

|
|
Reply
|
4:28 am, Nov 4, 2009
barrett

No economic vision. Like Herbert Hoover, he's surrounded himself with elite institutional thinkers; like the ones who designed this economic collapse.

|
4:08 pm, Nov 4, 2009
DD3075

Wow, Corzine is giving his concession speech. He spent $120 million. Unbelievable.

Congrats to Christie.

|
|
Reply
10:57 pm, Nov 3, 2009
mcmchugh99

I will not listen to these Repigs. I will not cooperate with them in any way. They are the enemy.

|
|
Reply
|
11:20 pm, Nov 3, 2009
pricklypear

So much intolerance. Democracy is not for sissies.

|
|
Reply
12:19 am, Nov 4, 2009
LeftCoastRightBrain

Liberal rage is so amusing. Shocking discovery that you obviously haven't cottoned on to. All Dims are not alike. Neither are all Reps. Is your mind expanding? Each state elects its own legislators. They have to respond (well, at least theoretically) to wishes, needs, desires of their constituencies.

Forty years ago, the Dims and Reps voted with their own caucuses about 62% of the time. Reps and Dims crossed party lines based on issues not so much politics.

Today they vote with their caucuses about 92% of the time. Issues be damned, it's all politics all the time now.

|
|
Reply
12:25 pm, Nov 4, 2009
mcmchugh99

And I hope they fail.

|
|
Reply
|
11:21 pm, Nov 3, 2009
democracyforall

now, now....

They have much to do after the mess their predecessors left for them to fix,
it will be tough.

|
|
Reply
|
9:44 am, Nov 4, 2009
barrett

The problem is that they're on the wrong track; and confident, no less!

|
4:10 pm, Nov 4, 2009
NewyorkerR

i can feel hate in the air. whats up with that?

|
|
Reply
|
11:31 pm, Nov 3, 2009
jus1drun

hey your boys beat my angels. that's a hell of a lot more important than politics but you know what, i'm prepared to bury the hatchet. go yankees!

|
|
Reply
|
11:40 pm, Nov 3, 2009
NewyorkerR

how true it is... go Yanks

|
4:31 am, Nov 4, 2009
Carole65

Yes, a winter chill has descended on the "progressive" liberals tonight, and they're understandably upset. But when you choose to ride the wave of massive spending in down economy and unemployment at 10% and growing, according to the President, you're bound to be shocked when the electorate says "NO".
The "fat man" sang tonight

|
|
Reply
|
11:46 pm, Nov 3, 2009
AlanD2

Carole: You really shouldn't say such impolite things about Christie and his singing.

|
12:07 am, Nov 4, 2009
pricklypear

The '08 election was not for "progressives" anyway, Carol65. The election was against Bush. The election was against the Republicans who always put party and themselves first and our U.S.A. last.

|
12:35 am, Nov 4, 2009
crymeariver

Carole65: But when you choose to ride the wave of massive spending in down economy.
--------------------------

Econ 101 Carole. When the private sector isn't spending money and the country is heading into a depression, the government HAS to spend money. That was the lesson of the depression. Even conservative economics know that. Only the ignorant or the delusional are not aware of that. That is why China had a GDP of over 8% for the year: government spending in the face of an approaching depression. And that is why China can now afford to keep buying our debt.

See what happens when you drop out of elementary school?

|
1:14 am, Nov 4, 2009
Carole65

crymeariver: The 2008 TARP package and the 2009 stimulus packaged stopped the bleeding in the financial markets. The problem is that only one third of it has been spent,and I will concede that it takes time for the money to filter through various agencies before it can be further effective. Wouldn't it make more sense to see how effective those packages have been before piling on other massive spending programs.
In China a good portion of their stimulus package went to cutting taxes, They also increased teachers' pay and low income housing projects. So far in the US the 2 packages have gone to bailing out banks, investment entities, and a few road projects. Main street has still not felt stimulated, so they're paying off their debt and saving instead of spending. That, in itself, is a good thing in the long run, but businesses are still not hiring and unemployment is still rising. Therefore, the tax base is shrinking and this government will be hard pressed to fund their spending proposals.
See what happens when you think beyond Econ 101............

|
7:08 am, Nov 4, 2009
matthewbenzor

The real race is in 23 "why" because if the democrats win that race,its just the beginning of how the Re-publicans are going to screw themselves by spilting the party while democrats walk on by with a win everytime,Mark my word its "NOT" good for the re-publicans, These are Governors they make "NO" policy in washington the real races are in 2010 the senate races and we shall see the Conservatives go after the moderates in the re-publican party ,Like I said the real race is 23 if Owens wins the Re-publicans are SCREW'D because its just the start of a unhappy party destroying it self

|
|
Reply
|
12:12 am, Nov 4, 2009
rhonda1309

While we would have liked Hoffman to win, WE BUSTED A RINO! this is over your head. Doug Hoffman, hell of try, came from nowhere and nearly pulled it off. Scuzzy you name is fitting, conservatives called you out and you ran to your pimp like a two-bit whore. Conservatives lost nothing, there were two democrats running against each other, one just called herself republican.

|
|
Reply
|
12:31 am, Nov 4, 2009
byersl

Now that's funny. Just this morning you kooks were crowing about how you were going to win the NY23 and sweep them all, but this one was the most important. Now it doesn't matter? Apparently, YOUR Messiah Sarah, just couldn't cut it, now could she. And that Tpaw--my Gd, he must be spinning like wild!

|
1:20 am, Nov 4, 2009
winston1

rhonda1309 It's time to sing KUMBAYA

|
4:32 am, Nov 4, 2009
freshhell

Sadly, with some "conservatives", their misogynistic and/or racist ideologies are never too far below the surface - too bad you can't gloat without resorting to truly distasteful and pointless sexist slurs.

|
10:58 pm, Nov 4, 2009
theoPitt

You do realize the founding of this country was to unite the States, right? That originally States rights were supposed to supercede the Federal Government, right?

You are correct that Governors don't make policy in Washington, and the crying shame of it all is that you think its fine for the Federal Government to tell your State what is best for it. Just like you and your "progressive" friends think the Federal Government knows better how you should live your life than you do.

|
|
Reply
|
8:26 am, Nov 4, 2009
barrett

Really? And I thought it was to rip off the Indians.

|
4:12 pm, Nov 4, 2009
Cleanerman

Well, there is a lot of opinion here, but, I just say never underestimate the GOP. And people are rightfully scared about the economy. And, Americans always vote their pocketbook even over wars (where young men and women die for us) which is shocking to me. On a daily basis, many of us never even think about our servicemen over in the Middle East. Anyhow, if the Dems can't get the economy moving in a positive direction, look out for the return of the Repugs. I don't like them--they play head games with the common man but never deliver to them, just often win their votes! I am a Independent/libertarian--lean Democrat mix! I stay frustrated with most all the politicians.

|
|
Reply
|
1:04 am, Nov 4, 2009
rhonda1309

you mean Sarah Palin from her "FACEBOOK PAGE" scares you that much!

|
|
Reply
1:48 am, Nov 4, 2009
ChanRobt

What a phony spin. Of course it has to do with Obama, and the Democratic Congress as well.

Together they are scaring the hell out of reasonable people such as the average Virginian.

And even New Jersey is so frightened by the radical Leftists given free rein under Obama, that they are sending a message to Washington while throwing the bum out of Trenton.

|
|
Reply
|
1:12 am, Nov 4, 2009
FatFreddy

You have no idea what you are talking about. Nobody in NJ is afraid of "radical Leftists". That's your own deep rooted fear. People in NJ are upset about things like funding for the Abbott school district program. If you don't know what an Abbott School district is, you have no business commenting on what NJsians want or don't want. Stay the fuck out of my state, when it comes to local politics.

|
|
Reply
4:42 am, Nov 4, 2009
FatFreddy

"Exit polls showed that 89 percent of voters in New Jersey, ... were "very" worried about the economy"

Well then, it makes perfect sense to elect a federal prosecutor to "fix" the economy.


|
|
Reply
|
4:11 am, Nov 4, 2009
LeftCoastRightBrain

So it would have made more sense to re-elect the ex-pres of Goldman? A bit inconsistent it since the left blames "Wall Street" for the financial crisis.

I would suggest to you that Corsine did to NJ what you accuse Wall Street of doing to Main Street.

Yet again, liberal inconsistency.

|
|
Reply
|
12:28 pm, Nov 4, 2009
FatFreddy

You obviously missed my previous comment, up the page.

In case you didn't know: From US News and world Report 1998

"Corzine did not fit the traditional mold of the well-connected financier who went to the right schools; he was born and raised in a southern Illinois farmhouse. Until his sudden resignation last week, he was preparing to offer shares to the public through an IPO. But the collapse of stock markets around the world, along with personality conflicts with top Goldman brass, took its toll. Heavy trading losses in 1998 caused Goldman's earnings to sink 80 percent. Perhaps more troubling for a firm that prides itself on camaraderie, Goldman insiders report that Corzine never got along with recently named co-CEO Henry Paulson Jr. (left). Paulson may consolidate the executive suite and continue Corzine's plan to go public by year's end."

|
4:29 pm, Nov 4, 2009
NewyorkerR

2010, 1 year till the real fun starts. so all you libs better think about getting into a detox program as the kool-aid fountain is going to be drying up. but, it looks like you will have some more places to get gay married and buy Pot. (Maine)
Congrats to the winner in NY 23

|
|
Reply
4:28 am, Nov 4, 2009
Housebird


Congratulations to AIPAK winning again.

What's all the fuss ????

|
|
Reply
5:48 am, Nov 4, 2009
Angellight

The wins of GOP governors will be unfortunate for the people of Virginia and New Jersey. If the people of these states thought they had it bad under Democratic governors, they have seen nothing yet. How long will some people continue to be Fooled by these Wizards of Oz? How long will they continue to circle the Yellow Brick Road? Republican politicians will not deliver the change these people seek but instead will impede it delivering more good and services to big corporations and insurance companies which will only continue the decay of these states. This is very unfortunate indeed!

|
|
Reply
|
6:41 am, Nov 4, 2009
theoPitt

What politician has ever delivered? I am sure there are a few, but seems the list of promises of a better day never fulfilled is pretty damn long on the Democrat side too.

|
|
Reply
8:29 am, Nov 4, 2009
LeftCoastRightBrain

Wow! Really? I had no idea.

Dims are the savior of the "regular folks" and Reps shill for Big Business?

I just love the cliché. You must too, because it doesn't require that you THINK.

|
|
Reply
12:04 pm, Nov 4, 2009
winston1

I guess it pay's to be fat in NJ. Democrats start stuffing your face.

That stupid ad Corzine put out really backfired.

|
|
Reply
|
7:09 am, Nov 4, 2009
FatFreddy

You gonna wait too, fat boy,
fat boy, wait til tomorrow,
You gonna wait too, fat boy,
fat boy, wait til tomorrow,

You, wait til tomorrow,
You, wait til tomorrow,
You gonna wait too, fat boy,
Fat boy, wait til tomorrow,
You gonna wait too, fat boy,
fat boy, wait til tomorrow.

|
|
Reply
7:31 am, Nov 4, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

View Full Cheat Sheet